[Tagging] Do we map pedestrian crossings twice?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jun 10 23:18:02 UTC 2020

Jun 11, 2020, 01:10 by jarek at piorkowski.ca:

> On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 14:27, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us> wrote:
>> To help me understand, below are three schemes for crossings. Which one(s) best describe your suggested way of mapping.
>> ...
>> 2. With no crossing ways, just a node on the highway to mark the type of crossing https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/4ad5wLzMNcE3sNo
> Mateusz has already pointed this out, but just to reinforce, this
> scheme would break pedestrian routing and require a wholesale rewrite
> of all routers to be able to jump between nearby ways.
And that rewrite would introduce unfixable routing bugs in cases where nearby
footways are not allowing pedestrain movement.

Also, that rewrite would be quite hard to implement without cratering performance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200611/2e52716f/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list