[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - 3rd and 4th rail (Colin Smale)

Garry Keenor garry.keenor at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 07:49:15 UTC 2020


Colin,

Thanks for your comments. I'm a bit behind so I'll try to catch up with
your comments to date.

Re: 3rd_rail/4th_rail vs 3rail/4rail
I really don't mind and will go with the majority. Not sure how you
determine a majority with this process!

Re: keeping electrified=rail to mean 3rd rail and have a new
electrified=4th_rail or  electrified=4rail We did discuss that as a group,
and again if that is the majority preference, I would not have a problem
with it.

Voltages for individual rails
We do have some thoughts on that which I will share in a later proposal,
but I would like to keep this change discussion focused purely on
electrification type.

Dual voltage areas
We do have a specific proposal/solution for that problem  which I will
share in a later proposal, but I would like to keep this change discussion
focused purely on electrification type.

3 phase electrification
II haven't thought about that one, let's get this proposal through the
process and I'll put it on the list to think about.

best regards,

Garry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200611/18985fb2/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list