[Tagging] nhd tags - documentation page review

[Volker Schmidt]

Is it not possible to get people who were involved in the original import
to check these.things?
I would be wary to remove such things remotely and without knowing what
information these codes carry ore once carried,

I had a look at our imported waterways in Italy (which have mainly two
problems: imprecise geometry, and age, but the imported codes make sense,
and help checking flow directions (which seems to be similar to the reach
parameter in the US imports)


On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 22:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> I created
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:fcode
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:ftype
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:reach_code
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:com_id
> about tags added in imports.
>
> Review is welcomed, especially the first two where I described tags
> with over 250 000 uses as pointless and unwanted.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200614/65bbe1a6/attachment.htm>