joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Tue Jun 16 19:20:32 UTC 2020
What would be the benefit of using type=route + route=circuit instead of
Would you be adding this route to ordinary
highway=primary/secondary/tertiary ways which happen to be used as a race
circuit once a year, e.g. for F1 races?
Or is this meant to be a way to make a single relation for all of the ways
which comprise a highway=raceway circuit?
Do you have some examples of existing objects which you would want to
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:00 AM Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>
> there is a long stalled proposal for a relation type of circuit for
> handling motor racing tracks. i suspect it will never be approved,
> the last time i brought it up there was a general lack of response.
> but it seems to me that a new relation type is not necessary anyway.
> probably adding a new subtype to route relations would be more than
> this would more than suit my requirements and i have no problem with
> going through and changing all the circuit relations i've done in
> OSM to use this tagging scheme. there are some subtags from the circuit
> proposal that would be useful to carry over for things like start and
> finish lines.
> rwelty at averillpark.net
> Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
> OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
> Java - Web Applications - Search
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging