[Tagging] Route names that aren’t names
ajt1047 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 20:27:07 UTC 2020
On 28/03/2020 19:16, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:
> Well, if somebody takes care of rendering  OSM data structure,
> situation doesn't look so bad.
>  https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=10!54.7983!-1.3075
Not really - that's just ignoring names on the main map and showing
superrelation names on the right in a separate legend. Try figuring out
which "NB" is which without using the mouseover highlight.
I ended up having to code specifically for the data (something you
couldn't do internationally).
means that at
route 645 just gets a ref but "National Byway (Southwell Loop)" gets a
name, so that you can see at
which one is which.
Interestingly I'd say that
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1425019 is actually named
correctly. although a quick look at the route suggests that the "phantom
mergers" have been at it again. :(
More information about the Tagging