[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Dog hazard

ael witwall3 at disroot.org
Wed May 13 11:13:08 UTC 2020


On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:26:07PM -0700, Tod Fitch wrote:
> dog=yes|no|leashed already exists for a totally different semantic (letting dog owners know if their pet is allowed).
> 
> If this goes forward I would prefer reversing thing and make it hazard=dog. That would also allow other types of hazards to be mapped.
> 
> Checking taginfo it seems hazard=* [1] is in use. Why not go with it?

You beat me to it. The existing hazard tag is the obvious choice which I
use quite often. Although it does not seem to be well supported by data
consumers. I have used it in Cornwall to flag open mine shafts, and in
one case to warn of dangerous (illegal) dogs on a right of way through a
farmyard.

ael




More information about the Tagging mailing list