[Tagging] relations & paths

[Paul Johnson]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:43 AM Jmapb <jmapb at gmx.com> wrote:

> On 5/13/2020 10:12 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> We've had relations for over a decade now, IIRC.  It's time to stop
> treating this basic primitive as entity-non-grata.  If tools *still* can't
> deal with this, this is on the tools and their developers now.
>
> Sure. Regarding the original question -- in what circumstances are
> single-member walking/hiking/biking route relations a good mapping practice
> -- what would be your answer?
>

Is it part of a network?  Is it signed as part of a network?  OK 166 was a
single member relation until I did lane tagging on it and had to split that
way a couple times.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200513/1aac3b60/attachment.htm>