[Tagging] Remove non-prefixed versions of 'contact:' scheme

[Valor Naram]

Hi,

I was busy and couldn't participate in this very interesting
discussion.

My proposal:
- Moving all social media keys like `facebook`, `twitter`, `whatsapp`,
`telegram` etc. to a `socialmedia` namespace like
`socialmedia:facebook`, `socialmedia:twitter`, `socialmedia:whatsapp`,
`socialmedia:telegram` etc.
-  Enriching the definition of `phone` and therefore `contact:phone`
(because they mean the same): "If the `phone` key is mapped on an
object with `amenity=telephone` then `phone` is the phone number of the
telephone box and not the phone number of the operator."
- `phone` --> `contact:phone`
- `email` --> `contact:email`

Now the difficult part begins because no "mechanical edit" is possible
(or at least very difficult and error-prone) here:
- `contact:website`: Only websites to be used for contacting purpose
only (and having little or no information character).
- `website`: All the other websites of a POI not fitting in the
definition of `contact:website`. So providing valuable information
about the POI.

Cheers

Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <
tagging at openstreetmap.org>
To: Cj Malone <CjMalone at mail.com>
Cc: tagging at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Remove non-prefixed versions of 'contact:'
scheme
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 00:01:33 +0200


sent from a phone
> On 10. May 2020, at 23:55, Cj Malone <CjMalone at mail.com> wrote:
> I think we should actively encourage more precise tags
> likecontact:phone when it's a contact number.

why is this “more precise”? What about even “more precise” tags,
likecontact:phone:business_hours=contact:phone:reservations=even
better?
IMHO dataconsumers find the tags easiest if they use the same key, if
they have to search for the keys it will make everyone’s life harder
not better.
Cheers Martin _______________________________________________Tagging
mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200516/e2ab8d29/attachment.htm>