[Tagging] track vs footway, cycleway, bridleway or path

[Volker Schmidt]

Please use full tagging and don't create implicit values after the fact.
We do have the width or est_width tags,tets use them, where they are needed.

On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 21:35, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
>
>
> May 21, 2020, 19:20 by miketho16 at gmail.com:
>
> So are we saying highway=path/cycleway/footway implies width<3 (or some
> similar value)?
>
> Yes, but it may be larger. Especially busy cycleway, or cycleway on curve,
> or cycleway
> on a slope may be noticeably larger.
>
> There is also an old problem how large footway should be to qualify as a
> pedestrian road,
> with varied opinions.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200521/24f58fef/attachment.htm>