[Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

[Peter Elderson]

YM routes tagged as superroute? Or all routes with relation members?
Peter Elderson


Op za 23 mei 2020 om 21:08 schreef Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:

> By the way, superroute relations in JOSM now show continuity correctly if
> the last node of the last way is the same as the first node of the first
> way in two sequential route relations. (It was a feature request I made and
> someone developed it).
>
> Jo
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:47 PM Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> > For now, I just want an alternative for the section/segment/leg numbers
>> or refs that are often in the name tag now.
>> > They are there to get neat ordered lists in tools and applications.
>> That seems to work fine, but it abuses the name tag, which I am told is a
>> problem for searching routines. A name tag should contain a proper name as
>> found on the street, and nothing else, that's the short version of some
>> very long rants I have encountered...
>> >
>> > At the moment, I move comments, descriptions, distance and trail refs
>> to the appropriate tags.
>> > From-via-to information I copy to the from, via and to tags.
>> > I just need a nice and intuitive tag to copy the ordering information
>> to.
>>
>> If the section number is an official identifier, then it's a ref (or
>> possibly an unsigned_ref). There should be no collision because
>> nothing keeps a superroute from having a ref of its own.
>>
>> If you're identifying a section number in order to sort the members of
>> a superroute, Don't Do That.  Keep the superroute in order.
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/919642 remains a worked
>> example; the sections are listed from south to north. Route relations
>> are ordered; they're not just buckets of members.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200523/b12812c6/attachment.htm>