[Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

[Phake Nick]

在 2020年5月25日週一 16:12，Florian Lohoff <f at zz.de> 寫道：

>
> Hola,
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 08:52:21AM +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
> > 1. Live and let live - OSM has always been a broad church. It might not
> > be your hobby, but it is their's. The bar to actively deleting other
> > people's work should be set very high indeed.
>
> I subscribe to this aswell. As long as it does not collide with stuff
> in use we should be able to tolerate data of historic or special purpose
> most of us probably do not aim for.
>
> The broad scope of your subject must otherwise be answered with: "No"
>
> It IS Best Common Practice to follow the "On the ground" rule with only
> very few exceptions.
>
> And IMHO we cant lift that. OSM needs to have a common ground to discuss
> matters and sometimes reality is already pretty hard to agree on. If we
> now add stuff in history or in the minds of mappers we open a pretty
> difficult can of worms.
>
> So - To quote from Postels Law - On of the inventors of the Internet:
>
> "Be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others"
>
> Flo
> --
> Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
>         UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Your email initially sound like you thinl they shouldn't be deleted but
then it sound like you think they shouldn't be kept?

>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200525/9b393baf/attachment.htm>