[Tagging] oneway=yes on motorways

[Volker Schmidt]

Please come back to my original question: *I would like to eliminate the
contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you propose?*

On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <jm at liotier.org> wrote:

> On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that the JOSM style
>> that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not show ways
>> properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a bug in the
>> style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes.
>>
>
> I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on this.  If anything, it gives
> validators more to work with if you start doing something weird.
>
> Isn't that what oneway=no is for ?
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200526/4657f2fb/attachment.htm>