[Tagging] oneway=yes on motorways

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Based on my experience it is usually better to write something, even not ideal and
ask for a review.

"Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored.

May 26, 2020, 10:58 by voschix at gmail.com:

> Please come back to my original question: > I would like to eliminate the contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you propose?
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <> jm at liotier.org> > wrote:
>
>> On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that              the JOSM style
>>>>  that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not              show ways
>>>>  properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a              bug in the
>>>>  style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on          this.  If anything, it gives validators more to work with if          you start doing something weird.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't that what oneway=no is for ?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>  Tagging mailing list
>>  >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>  >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200526/55124f06/attachment.htm>