[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

Yves ycai at mailbox.org
Thu Nov 26 11:16:26 UTC 2020

And hazards for niche practices (climbing, whitewater sports, ski touring,...) that are actually mapped in OSM are not generally signposted or 'official'.
Maybe we can't expect this proposal to cover them, but you can't prevent users to use the tag hazard to map them.

Le 26 novembre 2020 10:10:45 GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a écrit :
>Am Do., 26. Nov. 2020 um 08:25 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
>tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
>>    - It is not explicitly mentioned, but it would be a good idea to have
>>    explicit mention
>>    - is it OK to tag hazard that
>>    -
>>    - - exists
>>    - - is unsigned
>>    - - government has not declared that it exists (maybe government is
>>    dysfunctional/missing like
>>    - in Somalia, or it is covering-up the problem, or it has higher
>>    priorities - for example during war)
>+1. This may also depend on the context. The same kind of hazard on a road
>may well be signposted, but not on a hiking trail in a forest.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201126/aa67d525/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list