[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Nov 26 09:10:45 UTC 2020


Am Do., 26. Nov. 2020 um 08:25 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org>:

>
>    - It is not explicitly mentioned, but it would be a good idea to have
>    explicit mention
>    - is it OK to tag hazard that
>    -
>    - - exists
>    - - is unsigned
>    - - government has not declared that it exists (maybe government is
>    dysfunctional/missing like
>    - in Somalia, or it is covering-up the problem, or it has higher
>    priorities - for example during war)
>
>

+1. This may also depend on the context. The same kind of hazard on a road
may well be signposted, but not on a hiking trail in a forest.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201126/72d5a1b9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list