[Tagging] Unverfied Edits, Reverting Tags

[joost schouppe]

Clay,

While I do agree that this person seems to be more interested in "proving
to the world that they are right" than in actually productively working
towards a solution, I do not think this kind of language is welcome in this
forum. OpenStreetMap should be better than that. Consider that people from
quite different backgrounds than your own will be able to read this for
years to come - and it might weigh in to their decision whether or not to
participate.

Best,
Joost

Op ma 12 okt. 2020 om 17:50 schreef Clay Smalley <claysmalley at gmail.com>:

> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020, 10:31 AM Hartmut Holzgraefe <
> hartmut.holzgraefe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2020-10-12 15:51, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
>> > DWG and the foundation, are not in the verification and editing
>> > business, so who is ?, under penalty of banning.
>>
>>
>> context?
>>
>
> He got banned for being a dick:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3979
>
> He's probably just complaining that I'm reverting his edits for a second
> time. It's getting old.
>
> -Clay
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>


-- 
Joost Schouppe
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
<http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201016/69ed4b0a/attachment.htm>