[Tagging] What does bicycle=no on a node means?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Oct 18 08:33:48 UTC 2020




Oct 18, 2020, 10:20 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:

>
>
>>>>> Imagine I would add hgv=no or motorcycle=no tags to                  pedestrian crossings
>>>>>
>>>> Is there a case where hgv use sidewalk together with            pedestrians and cross road using crossing shared with a            pedestrians?
>>>>
>>>> Is there a case of sidewalk where hgv are allowed but on            crossing with road oneis supposed to walk carrying your            vehicle?
>>>>
>>>> Is there some existing usage of hgv=noon crossings?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Valid questions, but the exact same questions apply for a          pedestrian way crossing a secondary. On that pedestrian way          cyclists are not allowed so what is the use of adding          bicycle=no to the crossing node?
>>>
>>>
>> I agree that adding bicycle=no on highway=crossing is        pointless on footways with bicycle=no or
>> where bicycle=no is implied
>>
>> It is useful solely if cyclists are allowed on        cycleway/footway crossing road and are obligated to
>> dismount if crossing road at that point
>>
>
> It would be good if all crossings that require this special      handling can be found searching for bicycle=no + highway=crossing      but that is not possible as the overwhelming majority are cases of      pointless tagging. 
>
>
It is possible  to narrow them to find just ones attached to way with highway=cycleway or footways
with bicycle=yes/bicycle=designated (using overpass API)

> For these abnormal cases cyclist are never obliged to dismount at      the point of the crossing but from one side of the road to the      other side of the road so tagging that part of the way separately      is more precise.
>
>
>
>
>> (and yes, in most cases, though not all,        it can be retagged as access tagging on way)
>>
>
>
>
>
> Can you give an example?
>
>
cycleway:both=lane road with crossing for pedestrians only (I am giving this example to you for 
a third time)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201018/d87dc34a/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list