[Tagging] What does bicycle=no on a node means?

[Kevin Kenny]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 3:46 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 13. Oct 2020, at 23:42, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I changed the crossing to the way we do it in many parts of Europe, i.e. a
> crossing node *and* a crossing way.
>
>
>
> I thought the standard was highway=crossing on the nodes where they cross
> the road and highway=footway with footway=crossing on the way segment
> between the kerbs (if sidewalks are mapped) or between the crossing nodes
> (if several carriageways are present).
>

For the specific way that Volker was discussing,  the situation was a
stand-alone shared-use foot/cycleway crossing a tertiary highway. Single
carriageway, but with a way segment added to the cycleway to carry the
signed  `bicycle=dismount` restriction. No kerbs anywhere.

-- 
73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201015/e1bf4e65/attachment.htm>