[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Artificial

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Can you link actual scientific publication?

I am willing to change my mind but
I would need to check is it tested on
some sane sample of people, not
"Canadian males going to university with me"

(psychology scientific papers are
often only "scientific".
 
So I am not going
to treat seriously one that is not
documenting properly its methodology,
especially info how interviewed people
were selected and whatever sample size
was of serious size rather than 
"Sample size was 10, I interviewed
my family and friends".

See also replication crisis mess, where 
turned out that many highly cited and 
widely promoted papers in sociology and
psychology were worthless (yes, I am 
salty about believing in Ted talk about
power pose that was based on misleading
claims)


21 Oct 2020, 06:57 by robert at rtbk.com.au:

> 'her generic man' has been fixed - it was a typo.
>
> now reads:
> "confirmed that when people read or hear the generic version of 'man', people form mental pictures of males"
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201021/f31feffe/attachment.htm>