[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tag:shelter_type=rock_shelter

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Sep 5, 2020, 00:45 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> Am Fr., 4. Sept. 2020 um 22:21 Uhr schrieb Tom Pfeifer <> t.pfeifer at computer.org> >:
>
>> On 04.09.2020 18:19, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
>>  >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:shelter_type%3Drock_shelter
>>  >>
>>  > 
>>  > I'd suggest natural=rock_shelter as a replacement tag.
>>  
>>  +1 for going into the natural key
>>  My expectations to amenity=shelter would be something purpose-built,
>>  which is true for all subtypes except that rock_shelter
>>
>
>
> amenity=shelter is not about being purpose-built but about something being used for a purpose.
>
+1 - I am 100% fine with amenity=shelter with rocks acting as a shelter (as long as usefulness
is as good as purpose made shelter, not like with this children-sized tiny overhang that was mentioned)

> I would not use the natural key with a value like "shelter" or "rock_shelter", as this is about the purpose, a specific use of the situation, and not a description of the physical situation.
> From the point of view of shelter tagging, shelter_type=rock_shelter seems a valid approach and I would go for it.
>
> You could still double tag it with natural=cliff_overhang (or whatever describes the feature) if you like.
>
or natural=cave_entrance if applicable

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200905/64e4a5d8/attachment.htm>