[Tagging] automated edits seem to remove crossing=zebra drastically

Clifford Snow clifford at snowandsnow.us
Wed Sep 16 23:40:18 UTC 2020


On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 2:46 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> I must admit that I only do crossings as =traffic_signals; =marked (by
> itself) for zebra crossings; & =unmarked where there is provision to cross
> the road but no signage or roadway markings on any sort.
>
>
> I do crossings as crossing=marked/unmarked. I believe software should be
able to identify if the crossing has a stop sign or traffic signal.
Pedestrian walk/don't walk are low on my radar right now.

I stopped using zebra since they seemed more appropriate for a crossing in
England than where I live in the US. Crossing=marked/unmarked the only
thing I see where I map them.

BTW - I believe in the US hitting a pedestrian in a marked crossing is
illegal most everywhere. In some cities, drivers seem to believe they have
the right of way over pedestrians, even if they are in a marked crossing.

In another country I've spent some time in, cars definitely have the right
of way over pedestrians.
-- 
@osm_washington
www.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200916/d2233685/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list