[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -mass rock

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Apr 3 09:29:55 UTC 2021




Apr 3, 2021, 00:39 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 2 Apr 2021, at 14:25, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Also, historic=place_of_worship carries an implication that it still
>> is a place of worship.  Such is the way in which historic=* has
>> been (ab)used.
>>
>
>
> it would be in line with historic=monastery for sites of former monasteries and opposed to amenity=monastery for an active community.
>
active monastery (amenity=monastery) can be in historic=monastery
"historic=monastery" does not mean "no longer existing monastery",
in the same way as historic=tomb doe not mean "no longer used tomb",
the same goes for historic=church etc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210403/dc118195/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list