[Tagging] tagging proposal for fossils
joost.schouppe at gmail.com
Thu Apr 8 11:22:27 UTC 2021
I answered on the Talk page (where Mateusz posted the same content, thanks!)
Op wo 7 apr. 2021 om 15:39 schreef Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
> Thanks for a proposal!
> note that location=building conflicts with
> location=indoor / location=outdoor / location=rooftop
> (fossil may be build into wall from outside and from inside)
> The same for location=artefact.
> For example fossil exhibited in museum would be both location=indoor and
> Maybe use some new tag for that, extraction_state or something else?
> (extraction_state is terrible, but I was not looking for a better value
> for long)
> Apr 7, 2021, 14:36 by joost.schouppe at gmail.com:
> After a short previous discussion, here's a proposal for mapping fossils:
> - use natural=fossil for any fossil worth mapping
> - to differentiate between different kinds of fossils, I suggest a few new
> values under the location tag
> - use fossil:location to describe details about how to find the fossil
> Joost Schouppe
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging