[Tagging] tagging proposal for fossils

joost schouppe joost.schouppe at gmail.com
Thu Apr 8 11:22:27 UTC 2021


Hi,
I answered on the Talk page (where Mateusz posted the same content, thanks!)

Op wo 7 apr. 2021 om 15:39 schreef Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org>:

> Thanks for a proposal!
>
> note that location=building conflicts with
> location=indoor / location=outdoor / location=rooftop
> (fossil may be build into wall from outside and from inside)
>
> The same for location=artefact.
> For example fossil exhibited in museum would be both location=indoor and
> location=artefact.
>
> Maybe use some new tag for that, extraction_state or something else?
> (extraction_state is terrible, but I was not looking for a better value
> for long)
>
> Apr 7, 2021, 14:36 by joost.schouppe at gmail.com:
>
> Hi,
>
> After a short previous discussion, here's a proposal for mapping fossils:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fossil
>
> TL;DR:
> - use natural=fossil for any fossil worth mapping
> - to differentiate between different kinds of fossils, I suggest a few new
> values under the location tag
> - use fossil:location to describe details about how to find the fossil
>
> Best,
> Joost Schouppe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>


-- 
Joost Schouppe
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
<http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210408/51a73f97/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list