[Tagging] How to tag recreational route with multiple route types?

[Yves]

In my opinion, a route is something rather abstract. At least more abstract than a way on which we tag surface=, smootheness=...
So when we use a route relation to *model* a route in OSM,  the exact model we use is not so important as long as the route is mapped properly. The 'one feature, one element' is very rhetoric here! 

If a hiking relation share the exact same members as another cycling relation, the information is there, no need to give a harder time to data consumers. 
A highly specialized tool like waymarkedtrail may detects multiple use relations, but you can't expect every new player to do the extra work for that. Keeping the data simple also helps in seeing the data used more widely. 
Regards, 
Yves 


Le 12 août 2021 20:30:22 GMT+02:00, Robin Burek <robin.burek at gmx.de> a écrit :
>Am 12.08.2021 um 13:02 schrieb Yves via Tagging:
>> I fully agree on Peter 3rd option.
>> After all, is it worth mapping a multi-use route as a multi-use route
>> because the operator made it this way?
>I dont agree with that. When there are one Route, that called XY and is
>designed for hiking and biking? Then there should not be two routes with
>the name XY.... Then you have two objects for one feature. The route
>only exists once.....
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210815/bf37b786/attachment.htm>