[Tagging] cyclist profiles - was:Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' - cycle_network?

JochenB JochenB at wolke7.net
Wed Dec 1 20:44:55 UTC 2021


Am 27.11.2021 um 17:47 schrieb Flips:
> We do not need the key network:type=basic_network
> Instead we need a key like network=base, network=basis or network=generic
>
> So we will still have the standard key route=bicycle/hiking/...
> And we get an extra key to separate the touristic routes or any other
> routes (l*n/r*n/n*n/i*n) from the noname/nonumber/nospecialsymbol network.
>
> Each of this new routes contains only the way-segments between two
> signposts.
> This routes can than again be collected in a network-relation like the
> big one which is now called NRW.
>
> Renderers can than put the lowest priority to this routes and give
> them a different colour or line-width.
>
> Routing-devices might find a code, so you can choose which routes to
> follow.
>
That’s exactly what I’m looking for. I almost don't care what the key
is, the main thing is that you can distinguish the two things.




More information about the Tagging mailing list