[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush
Florian Lohoff
f at zz.de
Wed Feb 3 21:48:06 UTC 2021
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:29:22PM -0500, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
> I'm surprised to learn that people are using natural=scrub on landscaped
> areas. I was under the impression that natural=scrub is used for wild or
> unmaintained areas, not intentional ornamental landscaping.
People do so and they even overlap landuse with natural.
I made myself a debug view for stuff like that and remove it. Either an area
is natural or it is used e.g. landuse. But IMHO there cant be a natural
in a landuse or vice versa.
This is all what i consider tagging for the renderer and it is caused
by the lack of alternatives for micromapping.
landcover may be one.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
"Autoritaetsduselei ist der groesste Feind der Wahrheit" - Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210203/175f08e4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list