[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush

[Florian Lohoff]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:02:32PM +1100, Warin wrote:
> On 4/2/21 8:48 am, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:29:22PM -0500, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
> > > I'm surprised to learn that people are using natural=scrub on landscaped
> > > areas.  I was under the impression that natural=scrub is used for wild or
> > > unmaintained areas, not intentional ornamental landscaping.
> > People do so and they even overlap landuse with natural.
> > 
> > I made myself a debug view for stuff like that and remove it. Either an area
> > is natural or it is used e.g. landuse. But IMHO there cant be a natural
> > in a landuse or vice versa.
> 
> 
> Ever hear of 'native forest logging"??? Where native forests are
> harvested for their timber. And the native trees are replanted for
> future harvesting.
> 
> Note the key 'natural' is described as "describes natural physical
> land features, including ones that have been modified or created by
> humans." in the OSM wiki. I would prefer the key 'landcover' this
> this, with other things in 'natural' being 'landforms' e.g. peak,
> valley.

For me its either used as a forest for logging - Then its a
landuse=forest or its a nature reserve then its a natural=wood.

It cant be both. 

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                     f at zz.de
"Autoritaetsduselei ist der groesste Feind der Wahrheit" - Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210205/b515def5/attachment.sig>