[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush

[Vincent van Duijnhoven]

Well, I think that some kind natural=scree | bare_rock or glacier on some areas. It still is a natural feature that somehow be described (for example using natural tags). I knew function or design is not the correct term but I knew no better one in English. It is not always planned as some are just natural features.

According to this image [1], the landcover is then continental ice. You can tag something as natural=sand then has the landcover tag desert or so. That is in my opinion the difference.

 [1] http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~sujan/simage/lutype/gridx-gswp2.png



5 feb. 2021 11:38 van stefan.tauner at gmx.at:

> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:31:44 +0100 (CET)
> Vincent van Duijnhoven via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> We get a bit of topic but imo, a piece of land always has a function
>> or design ("inrichting" in Dutch). For some, functions, there is
>> still no proper tag like a potential landuse=highway. That it is not
>> known to the mapper does not mean it has no function. I think that
>> landcover therefore should never be rendered on carto but always
>> serve as a secondary tag. It should never be the only tag on an area
>> because the use is not known.
>>
>
> Can you please tell me the "function or design" of the area around here
> please:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=77.2798&mlon=-40.4256#map=9/77.2798/-40.4256
>
> -- 
> Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210205/bcd4d7bd/attachment.htm>