[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush

[Warin]

On 5/2/21 9:55 pm, Vincent van Duijnhoven via Tagging wrote:
> Well, I think that some kind natural=scree | bare_rock or glacier on 
> some areas. It still is a natural feature that somehow be described 
> (for example using natural tags). I knew function or design is not the 
> correct term but I knew no better one in English. It is not always 
> planned as some are just natural features.
>
> According to this image [1], the landcover is then continental ice. 
> You can tag something as natural=sand then has the landcover tag 
> desert or so. That is in my opinion the difference.
>
>  [1] http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~sujan/simage/lutype/gridx-gswp2.png
>
>
>
> 5 feb. 2021 11:38 van stefan.tauner at gmx.at:
>
>     On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:31:44 +0100 (CET)
>     Vincent van Duijnhoven via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>         We get a bit of topic but imo, a piece of land always has a
>         function
>         or design ("inrichting" in Dutch). For some, functions, there is
>         still no proper tag like a potential landuse=highway. That it
>         is not
>         known to the mapper does not mean it has no function. I think that
>         landcover therefore should never be rendered on carto but always
>         serve as a secondary tag. It should never be the only tag on
>         an area
>         because the use is not known.
>
>
>     Can you please tell me the "function or design" of the area around
>     here
>     please:
>     https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=77.2798&mlon=-40.4256#map=9/77.2798/-40.4256
>

+1.

Many parts of the world have little function or 'design'. These are 
usually in the less populated areas of the world...

While various 'research' stations exist in Antarctica most of it has no 
land use that I could map.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210206/3919d31d/attachment.htm>