[Tagging] This list requires moderation

[Yves]

I see the 'moderate replies' Frederick is calling for more of a reminder than something else.
Keeping the content more concise and to the point would certainly help more voices to be heard. 
Yves 




Le 7 février 2021 16:50:22 GMT+01:00, Florian Lohoff <f at zz.de> a écrit :
>
>Hi Frederik 
>
>On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 01:10:59PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> But the sheer volume of discussion is making it difficult for many to
>> follow the debates. And let's be honest: About 75% of the discussion
>> could be cut if we applied a little bit of ... moderation.
>
>Just to take a different stance on this. I am netizen for 25+ years and
>i am reading 100+ Mailinglists - tagging is very polite, organized and
>low volume by my comparisons.
>
>Discussions like the ones we have on tagging are about designing a
>system which is a matter of taste, not strict rules. Replying by
>repeating or adding little detail to other words makes individual
>standpoints. Participants then also follow people by personal trust not
>just arguments so it is sometimes important to make your point by
>publicly agreeing. I sometimes think its some kind of implicit
>liquid democracy, delegating "votes" by trust.
>
>Yes - People are emotionally involved and tend to reply to every single
>mail trying to make their point. Still - its a very lively debate.
>
>But in the end i fail to see a problem ;)
>
>Flo
>-- 
>Florian Lohoff                                                     f at zz.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210207/3ebe2bb6/attachment.htm>