[Tagging] Proposal ogham_stone

[Anne-Karoline Distel]

Thanks for the feedback. I really don't know about stone vs stone_type.
There is no wiki page for stone, that's why I didn't choose it. I don't
think I can be expected to suggest using keys that don't exist in the wiki.

b-unicycling

Am 07/02/2021 um 17:58 schrieb Jan Michel:
> Hi,
> I suggest to keep the proposal simple. That is, describe the main goal
> (introducing stone_type=ogham_stone), add a few relevant links to
> other tags (e.g. Key:inscription). Add a short explanation, why you
> chose to use stone_type instead of stone (because of current use of
> both keys strongly suggested that).
> Don't merge too many things into one proposal. There's always one
> special aspect one person doesn't like and that makes them vote against.
>
> Your basic proposal, to have a tag for Ogham stones would have been
> clearly approved if either the '_type' aspect or the inscription:*
> aspect had been missing.
>
> Regarding your idea of adding references to an external database -
> this could be done, but please use some standard tags.
> ref:ogham=NUMBER_OR_NAME would be a reasonable way.
> But don't include it in the proposal of your primary key - there's
> always a few voters who don't like external references (for good
> reasons) and, combined with others, let the proposal fail.
>
>
> Jan
>
> On 07.02.21 16:05, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote:
>> It looks like it might not get approved, so I'll have to adapt the
>> proposal to try and get a better standard. A resource has come to my
>> attention that could add more value. I'll just copy and paste what I
>> put on the discussion page, in case people don't find it there:
>  If we had a tag ogham_in_3d:ref
>>     to add the name, the link could be displayed similarly to how the
>>     wikipedia or mapillary links work.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210207/813f5725/attachment.htm>