[Tagging] Proposal ogham_stone

[Paul Allen]

On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 18:31, Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com>
wrote:

> There is a tag historic=rune_stone which sounds like it's a similar sort
> of thing.  Would historic=ogham_stone be a better fit perhaps?
>

Since ogham stones seem to all be memorials (I've never seen a shopping
list in ogham) then historic=memorial + memorial=ogham_stone fits
in better with existing tagging.

One of my objections to blanket use of historic=* for objects that
happen to be old (as opposed to being of historic note) is what we do
with modern recreations.  It would be possible for somebody to
create a modern ogham stone.  If the modern one is a memorial
then it is of historic note by virtue of being a memorial, not by
virtue of it being a stone with ogham on it.  If it is not a memorial
then it would have to be under man_made or some such.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210207/1fa3b1c4/attachment.htm>