[Tagging] Proposal ogham_stone
Anne-Karoline Distel
annekadistel at web.de
Sun Feb 7 22:15:57 UTC 2021
I could live with historic=ogham_stone.
It's just a pity that it'll be at least another 4 weeks until this will
be approved, if it is approved this time, when this would make such a
nice YouTube tutorial for my series. But better get it right first,
before spreading the gospel.
About the ref thing: Yes, it is very in depth tagging and doesn't need
to be part of the proposal. I want to use the ref tag to be able to link
to the Ogham in 3D page, like we do with mapillary ID and wikidata. They
don't have all Ogham stones in their database, so we can't generically
use the name to create the link.
Am 07/02/2021 um 20:43 schrieb Yves via Tagging:
> IMHO, it's the complete tag key=value that convey the meaning, no need
> to be so much restricted by a former key.
> But historic=* is okay too.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210207/2c1e6238/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list