[Tagging] Proposal ogham_stone

[Mateusz Konieczny]

For proposals based on already discussed/voted proposals it is not necessary
to run two weeks of RfC

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/change_vote_counting_rules_-_remove_no_show_paradox
was extracted from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/change_vote_counting_rules
where I terminated vote early, nobody complained
I plan to extract at least one more part into a separate vote, also without RfC

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:traffic_calming%3Dmini_bumps
vote with mini_bumps value started immediately after circle_bumps value
was rejected
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Tag:traffic_calming%3Dmini_bumps&direction=next&oldid=2095871#Voting
Nobody had trouble with that.

Have you checked documentation somewhere is it necessary to remake a RfC?
Where it would be a good place to mention that?

Feb 7, 2021, 23:50 by zelonewolf at gmail.com:

> Given that the initial RFC period has been completed, I would not consider this to "reset the clock" for subsequent attempts at a vote.  In my opinion, as long as adequate notice is given, once all input has been considered and responded to, it's acceptable to move to a vote once the discussion has gone quiet after a few days.  I don't think this is documented anywhere but that seems to have been the convention.
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 5:17 PM Anne-Karoline Distel <> annekadistel at web.de> > wrote:
>
>>
>> I could live with historic=ogham_stone. 
>>
>>
>> It's just a pity that it'll be at least another 4 weeks until      this will be approved, if it is approved this time, when this      would make such a nice YouTube tutorial for my series. But better      get it right first, before spreading the gospel.
>>
>>
>> About the ref thing: Yes, it is very in depth tagging and doesn't      need to be part of the proposal. I want to use the ref tag to be      able to link to the Ogham in 3D page, like we do with mapillary ID      and wikidata. They don't have all Ogham stones in their database,      so we can't generically use the name to create the link.
>>
>> Am 07/02/2021 um 20:43 schrieb Yves via      Tagging:
>>
>>> IMHO, it's the complete tag key=value that convey the meaning, no      need to be so much restricted by a former key.
>>>  But historic=* is okay too. 
>>>   
>>> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>  Tagging mailing list
>>  >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>  >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210208/1b7280f2/attachment-0001.htm>