[Tagging] Draft proposal for historic cemetery

Diego Cruz ginkarasu at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 22:40:29 UTC 2021


Hi Daniel,

I agree with your proposal. I'm in favour of adding the history tag to any
object with historical significance. This could be applied not only to
cemeteries, but to many other elements that currently just have a
descriptive tag in order to stress their importance as historical assets.
The current list of approved attributes to the history tag certainly needs
an expansion.

Dear Martin Koppenhoefer, if a cemetery is just a regular cemetery, you
simply don't add this.

Best regards
Diego Cruz


El mar., 9 feb. 2021 22:37, Daniel Capilla <dcapillae at gmail.com> escribió:

> Hi,
>
> I am Daniel from Spain.
>
> I am preparing a draft proposal for "historic=cemetery". The proposal is
> very simple. However, as this is the first time I am preparing a
> proposal, I am open to any suggestions.
>
> I am not going to propose it immediately. It is only a first draft. I
> will try to improve it if I can. Any collaboration is welcome. On the
> wiki discussion page I have already received some comments.
>
> Thanks to Martin for his initial comment some time ago [1] and to
> Jeisenbe for his collaboration on the wiki.
>
> Greeting from Spain.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
>
> [1]
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Historic_cemetery
> [2]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-December/056540.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210209/64deaa52/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list