[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forest(_compartment) relations

[Paul Allen]

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 11:29, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
> Unfortunately, this often leads to a somewhat buggy rendering, with trees
>> symbols rendered in the water.
>>
>

> This is deliberate to show that tagging is buggy.
>

Sometimes (very rarely) this is not bad tagging but deliberate.  Maybe
there's a better way of doing it, but trees in water is something I recently
had to map.  A former defensive moat (suspected to have originally
been an oxbow lake which was co-opted into a fortification) which now
has trees growing in much of it.  On Ordnance Survey maps it is shown
as water; from aerial imagery and archaeological reports the water has
trees in much of it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/890161871#map=18/52.04090/-4.42008
Maybe there's a better way of doing it but that was the best I could come
up with.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210210/cfea1cd2/attachment.htm>