[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop as post-partner

[Robin Burek]

Actually a postpartner can look (in Germany) so:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-QrBnftFq0A/maxresdefault.jpg
https://mar.prod.image.rndtech.de/var/storage/images/rnd/wirtschaft/uebersicht/wenn-der-kiosk-zum-paketshop-wird/580220740-1-ger-DE/Wenn-der-Kiosk-zum-Paketshop-wird_big_teaser_article.jpg
or
https://cosysfile.b-cdn.net/images/paket-management/shop/paketshop/paketshop-management.jpg


Am 11.02.2021 um 20:22 schrieb Paul Allen:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:25, Robin Burek <robin.burek at gmx.de
> <mailto:robin.burek at gmx.de>> wrote:
>
>     Am 11.02.2021 um 18:28 schrieb Peter Neale via Tagging:
>
>>
>>     They very often (but not always) have different operating hours,
>>     which you cannot show, if you insist on one entity with attributes)
>
>     of course you can, do you read my/our proposal?
>
> You're right.  All we have to do is change all the editors to handle
> your new way of specifying the extra opening hours.  And then
> change all the data consumers to handle the extra opening hours
> that otherwise they may not display.
>
> And then live with the fact that people looking at the map to find a
> post office won't see it because it's in a shop.  Or maybe they won't
> see the shop they're looking for because it's shown as a post office.
> Or maybe we can then convince all the different cartos to display some
> sort of new hybrid symbol.
>
> I'm not convinced this is a sensible idea, even in Germany.  Why
> don't you just pretend the post office counter is separate enough
> to count as shop-in-shop?
>
> --
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210211/057e762a/attachment.htm>