[Tagging] Draft proposal for historic cemetery

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 08:32, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> IMHO, any cemetery that is older than a few decades could be declared
> historic=cemetery and it would be hard to dispute. Any example for a
> cemetery in a city that is definitely not historic=cemetery, although it is
> older than WW II?
>

Here you are:
https://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/community/southport-general-cemetery-3688.html

Gazetted 1880, but earliest burial ~1878 (or earlier) after the town was
first established ~1875, but still in use today.

Historic? First gazetted cemetery in what is now the 6th biggest city in
Australia, but AFAIK, that's it's only real claim to fame.

speaking about Chopin,
>

 How about a node on that spot tagged as historic=grave (158 uses) or
historic=memorial + memorial=grave (345 uses)?

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210212/07ef28fd/attachment.htm>