[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush

[Vincent van Duijnhoven]

Graeme,

Apparently, you didn't get my update to the quote you gave:

The example values were more to illustrate my point. But just like wetland=* and grassland=*, scrub=* can be used to further define the type of scrub(land). 

For example, this wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrubland lists several types of scrub. One of them would be scrub=decoration ( or a better word if somebody knows one (urban_scrub?)) or so to be used on the shrub I am trying to find a tag for. The rest of the wilder bushes can then for example be defined with the types listed in the wiki.

This would of course require more research and a new proposal for scrub=* but before I put work in it, I first wanted to get others their opinion.

Greetings,
Vincent


15 feb. 2021 02:20 van graemefitz1 at gmail.com:

>
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 03:18, Vincent van Duijnhoven via Tagging <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>> Is it an idea to instead of introducing landuse=shrub, extend the natural=scrub with a new tag scrub=wild|decorative? This better describes the type of scrub than denotation=* or managed=*.
>>
>
> It's certainly not a > bad>  thought, but I don't think wild & decorative are quite the right words - although I also can't think of alternatives off the top of the head!
>
> There may also need to be another, middle, case for the beach area I posted earlier - it was planted, grows more or less wildly, but is also trimmed & weeded as necessary.
>
> & as Bert said - thank you for starting this discussion off! Your original idea may not have gone as well as you hoped, but as you can see from what has gone on, it was certainly a good thing to start talking about :-)
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210215/64c5153c/attachment.htm>