[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forestry(_compartment) relations (Was "Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forest(_compartment) relations")

[David Marchal]

I would say that this your example is technically forestry, but in a very short time window, and consequently not to be mapped in OSM. The definition of forestry I gave to Bert was voluntarily reductive: I only gave the items necessary in order to highlight the differences between the westerner notion of forestry and what he described in non-westerners cultures. As broad as the proposed definition is, I only had to state that what he talked about was out of it, and giving precise limits was unneccessary for this.

Regards.

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Le lundi 15 février 2021 10:30, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Am Mo., 15. Feb. 2021 um 10:17 Uhr schrieb David Marchal via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
>
> is this universally shared and an exhaustive definition of the term, or is it just describing a sustainable variant of forestry? In other words, if you cut down (for example) a virgin forest and only care for transporting and managing the timber, with no reforestation of the areas, could this form of "predatory exploitation" still be called "forestry" or would that be stretching the term beyond the general expectations of a native English speaker?
>
> Cheers
> Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210215/6239a995/attachment.htm>