[Tagging] Binding numbers

[Bert -Araali- Van Opstal]

No offense Peter, but please first think, cool down before you decide to
answer on a short message which had all good intentions to prevent your
great ideas from proceeding with success.
Sending a link to the import together with the original request for
tagging advise doesn't seem a big effort to me. In the contrary, it
seems as an import where the compatibility of the data has not been
sufficiently investigated before proceeding. But of course that is my
personal opinion.
Nothing is perfect, neither is this talk page, but it is moderated for
good reasons as the tone of your reply. And in this case could have been
prevented by sending the link to the import, a very small effort, in the
first place.  Much less then me or other community members having to
consult an import list because we have to guess that it could concern an
import, not referred to in any way, see who participates in it and then
kindly point them out to guidelines to prevent their efforts being reverted.

Regards, Bert Araali

On 16/02/2021 21:48, Peter Elderson wrote:
> S&R strategy - Sigh & Reply by sending the URL, over and over again.
>
> Moderation will not prevent this.
>
> Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op di 16 feb. 2021 om 19:23 schreef Skyler Hawthorne <osm at dead10ck.com
> <mailto:osm at dead10ck.com>>:
>
>     To add to what Kenny said, as an aside, this is a good example of
>     the earlier discussion of the kinds of behavior that need
>     moderating. Every single time I mention my import outside of the
>     imports list, if I don't painstakingly reexplain the entire
>     context with links to my import wiki page and previous discussions
>     about it, someone inevitably assumes I'm just doing a rogue import
>     and jumps in my face to tell me to follow the rules. It's quite
>     exhausting and makes it very difficult to participate in the
>     community. There needs to be more good faith around here.
>
>     Feb 16, 2021 12:09:01 Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com
>     <mailto:kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com>>:
>
>
>
>         On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:00 PM Bert -Araali- Van Opstal
>         <bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com
>         <mailto:bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             Skyler, if you are planning to do a mass import it is
>             strongly advised to follow
>             https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import. Without
>             carefully following the steps of this guidelines there is
>             a very high chance they will be rejected and reverted.
>
>
>         (Beating Skyler to the punch)
>
>         This is a much-discussed import already in progress in
>         conformity with the guidelines. As with many large imports. as
>         the import progresses, more edge cases are being
>         discovered. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_York/NYS_GIS_SAM_Address_Points_Import
>
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210217/8a918c25/attachment-0001.htm>