[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shrubbery

[Vincent van Duijnhoven]

There is indeed no rule that states that values should be singular. However, because all other values are actually singular in the natural key, for consistency, this unwritten rule should also be applied to the new value here in my opinion.

________________________________
Van: Peter Neale via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Verzonden: donderdag 25 februari 2021 12:54
Aan: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
CC: Peter Neale <nealepb at yahoo.co.uk>
Onderwerp: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shrubbery

I agree.  I am not aware of any "rule" / convention that they MUST all be singular.

landcover (yes, I know it is a different key, but it has similarities) uses mostly singular values, but also has "mosses", "pebbles".

Regards,
Peter
PeterPan99

On Thursday, 25 February 2021, 10:27:49 GMT, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:


On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 07:36, Vincent van Duijnhoven <vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com<mailto:vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com>> wrote:
It was also brought to my attention yesterday that all values in the natural key are singular. Shrubs is plural. For consistency, this value should also be singular.

Please point me at the place in the wiki where it says that all values in the
natural key must be singular.

--
Paul

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftagging&data=04%7C01%7C%7C6c49d3fcafd14de7cc1f08d8d9856354%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637498514203789324%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ZySVuBdEwlu2Xp7mZlbHY4QWjWiGbAGUdxfSoAZCvPM%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210225/025c98f4/attachment-0001.htm>