[Tagging] RFC historic=tomb and tomb=* tags, WAS Re: RFC: tomb key

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 26 Feb 2021, at 16:12, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just googled for your proposal to check if you had mentioned
> inscription=*.  Instead of your proposal I found 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dtomb
> 
> Looks like the horse has already bolted


yeah, the current procedure is just pro forma, as I’d rather like the proposal to be approved than abandoned :)
The tag is already in use, the proposal is from 2011...

Thanks for your clarification of terms. So a tumulus would contain several burial chambers but they could not be called graves.

 Could a sepulchre be seen a subclass of tomb or vice versa?

Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210226/9faebfe1/attachment.htm>