[Tagging] RFC historic=tomb and tomb=* tags, WAS Re: RFC: tomb key

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 27 Feb 2021, at 00:07, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In that case, can't you just mark it as "In use"?


that’s what I used to do, but a few years ago people started to argue that „in use“ was for tag documentation, not for proposals, and that proposals which aren’t voted become „abandoned“
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/tombs#Status


Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210227/54e703fb/attachment-0001.htm>