[Tagging] RFC historic=tomb and tomb=* tags, WAS Re: RFC: tomb key

[Mateusz Konieczny]

27 Feb 2021, 08:36 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
> sent from a phone
>
>
>> On 27 Feb 2021, at 00:07, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In that case, can't you just mark it as "In use"?
>>
>
>
> that’s what I used to do, but a few years ago people started to argue that „in use“ was for tag documentation, not for proposals, and that proposals which aren’t voted become „abandoned“
> See also > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/tombs> #Status
>
If proposal is inactive and tag is used,
then another option is to create pagedocumenting fee facto page and 
use 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Archived_proposal <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Archived_proposal>

This way proposal will be still available 
and will be unlikely to be confused fordescription of actual use
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210227/25b0d63c/attachment.htm>