[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop as post-partner

[Bert -Araali- Van Opstal]

Sorry, got the name wrong, it's Robin of course not Rubik.

On 28/02/2021 00:26, Robin Burek wrote:
> Am 27.02.2021 um 22:08 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>> it depends on the semantics we imply for our tags. How important is 
>> it to know whether it is one shop or two, at the same place
>
> I think it is very important. And heres a example: A week ago I was 
> standing in Berlin searched for a post partner-store, that was 
> disclaimed as an "post_office" in OSM. Hell and there was nothing at 
> all.... And why? Yeah, the real shop was closed two years ago. Thanks! 
> Due to two nodes it causes an error at some point - stupid, now it hit 
> me again. But it further reinforces the fact that setting multiple 
> nodes does not make sense. And I refer to it again - a shop-in-shop is 
> not meant!
>
> And if your argument goes like you called before, then you have to 
> list each meat or cheese counter individually. These are own services...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210228/3ad3b394/attachment.htm>