[Tagging] Proposed feature - Voting - electricity
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 01:12:15 UTC 2021
On 2/1/21 5:33 am, Lukas Richert wrote:
> It seems as of the creators of the socket tag do align it with the IEC
> standards. But I agree that some improvements could be made,
> especially with tagging the same plug with and without provided cable.
> One thing at a time though :)
Sockets are usually the source of power.
Plugs are usually used to withdraw power.
The existence of a cable could be indicated with cable=yes/n where n is
the length in meters (or other units identified as per other liner units).
> On 01/01/2021 18:15, Colin Smale wrote:
>> On 2021-01-01 17:38, Lukas Richert wrote:
>>> Also, the socket:* key is useful to specify the type and number of
>>> sockets available :) So, for example, socket:schuko=2 and
>>> socket:USB=1 if that is what is available in the pub.
>> It would be preferable to refer to IEC types rather than local names
>> like "Schuko" (this would be Type F).
Schuko is not a 'local name', but recognized internationally.
>> Also watch out for universal or multi-standard sockets.
>> For USB sockets, these days the type, power capacity and
>> fast-charging system (e.g. PD, QC) are also very relevant.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging