[Tagging] is explicit segregated tag needed on all ways allowing cyclists and pedestrians?

[Phake Nick]

I see no problem with the "segregated" key.
> It is only applicable to paths that carry explicit signs for
> bicycle=designated and foot=designted.
>
> It should be surface-independent, because there are (infrequent) cases of
> unpaved segregated foot-cyclepaths (I have seen them in parks). I have also
> seen cases of segregated foot-cycle paths where the pedestrians have
> pavement, and the cyclists do not, or vice versa.
>

I though most countries banned cycling on walkway or walking on cycleways,
and thus when a path is being tagged as designated for both, it's more
likely for the path ro in fact contain two separated parts each for walking
and cycling?

> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210104/df05478c/attachment.htm>