[Tagging] is explicit segregated tag needed on all ways allowing cyclists and pedestrians?

[Volker Schmidt]

The old OSM problem of the missing default definition for keys.
No way around that, I'm afraid.

On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 18:45, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:

> I know what it means. But in what case will segregated=no on a single way
> be handled different than no segregated tag?
>
> Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op ma 4 jan. 2021 om 17:43 schreef Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 3:01 PM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I never tag segregated=no. On a single way, only segregated=yes has any
>>> meaning. If it's not segregated=yes, it's not segregated.
>>>
>>
>> Not quite.  An absence of a tag doesn't mean it isn't segregated, it
>> means that OSM doesn't know.  segregated=no means "no, this definitely is
>> not segregated".  If it's not tagged, it's not unreasonable for data
>> consumers to assume it's not segregated, but it's possible it is.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210105/b6da7726/attachment.htm>