[Tagging] is explicit segregated tag needed on all ways allowing cyclists and pedestrians?

[Peter Elderson]

I know what it means. But in what case will segregated=no on a single way
be handled different than no segregated tag?

Peter Elderson


Op ma 4 jan. 2021 om 17:43 schreef Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:

> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 3:01 PM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I never tag segregated=no. On a single way, only segregated=yes has any
>> meaning. If it's not segregated=yes, it's not segregated.
>>
>
> Not quite.  An absence of a tag doesn't mean it isn't segregated, it means
> that OSM doesn't know.  segregated=no means "no, this definitely is not
> segregated".  If it's not tagged, it's not unreasonable for data consumers
> to assume it's not segregated, but it's possible it is.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210105/332f349b/attachment.htm>